CFPB Unlawfully Halted Progress on Mandatory Data Collection Critical For Enforcing Fair Lending Laws
Zackary Drucker, The Gender Spectrum Collection
Last week, on behalf of the California Reinvestment Coalition (CRC), the National Association for Latino Community Asset Builders (NALCAB), and small business owners from Iowa and Oregon, we and co-counsel Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP moved for summary judgment in our lawsuit against the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau for defying the Dodd-Frank Act and halting progress on a critical data collection aimed at protecting women-owned, minority-owned and small businesses against discriminatory lending practices.
Section 1071 of Dodd-Frank requires the CFPB to collect and make publicly available data on lending to women-owned, minority-owned, and small businesses and make it publicly available. This provision was designed by Congress to facilitate enforcement of fair lending laws to curb discrimination, and to identify and remedy “credit deserts” where businesses are unable to obtain the credit they need to grow and serve their communities. Congress mandated that the CFPB issue rules to implement this data collection, yet, in 2018, without any explanation, then-Acting Director Mick Mulvaney unlawfully deferred the required rulemaking process. Since her appointment, Director Kathleen Kraninger has taken no meaningful steps to remedy this failure.
Oregon and Iowa small business owners, National Association for Latino Community Asset Builders, and California Reinvestment Coalition detail harms caused by the Trump administration when the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau illegally abandoned progress towards anti-discrimination lending protections.
As plaintiff and Waterloo, Iowa small business owner ReShonda Young states in the filing, “Whether intentional or unintentional, credit seems to be far more limited for African-American business owners than for White small business owners. There is, however, no specific data that I can review to try to convince potential lenders or governmental agencies that our market is underserved and viable investment opportunities are being ignored.”
Portland, Oregon small business owner Deborah Field told the court that her “community is a credit desert for small businesses.” Ms. Field, who serves on the Small Business Council for Portland Business Alliance and works to improve access to capital for small businesses, spells out the difficulty with “applying to numerous banks when I know that some of those banks would probably reject my application outright without admitting that they don’t lend to small businesses.” As she emphasizes, the “nearly a decade of delay” of enforcement of 1071 leaves business owners like her in the lurch, unable to identify banks that would give her a fair opportunity to obtain the credit she needs.
Without this data, CRC must “devote greater resources to negotiating agreements with lenders to support the credit needs of minority-owned and small businesses… in communities that have historically faced barriers to accessing credit.” NALCAB similarly expects “to spend hundreds of thousands” of dollars in coming years researching credit needs for small businesses in local markets because CFPB continues to withhold Section 1071 data.
The administration’s unlawful delay is all the worse because the CFPB has explicitly admitted that current data is inadequate to fully understand, let alone remedy, the extent to which discriminatory lending harms business owners in “credit deserts.” The agency even claimed that “with current data it is not possible to confidently answer basic questions regarding the state of small business lending,” something Section 1071 of Dodd-Frank would accomplish if properly implemented by CFPB.
“The Trump administration has violated the law and turned its back on female, minority and small business owners in order to help financial institutions evade scrutiny,” said Democracy Forward Senior Counsel Nitin Shah.
The CFPB’s unlawful rollback of anti-discrimination protections is consistent with a pattern of anti-consumer actions taken under President Trump. The CFPB has failed to take needed steps to protect consumers, veterans, and student borrowers. An April 2019 report described the “strategic neglect and bureaucratic self-sabotage” that characterized the CFPB’s governance under Mulvaney’s tenure. Another analysis found that under Director Kraninger, CFPB enforcement activity has “declined” to levels much lower than at any time since the agency’s inception. In June 2017, the agency fired its entire Consumer Advisory Board.